World's Fastest PCB Manufacturing
My Message
Suggestions
Account

Get started now

Log In

or

Sign Up

My ALLPCB

My Orders Shipping Address Balance Account Settings My SNS Profile
0
  • Home
  • Instant Online Quote Alternate Text
    • PCB Instant Quote
    • PCB Assembly Quote
    • SMD-Stencil Quote
  • PCB Assembly
  • PCB Capabilities
  • Feedback
  • Resources
    • Sponsorship
    • PCB Softwares
    • Units Conversion
    • FAQ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • About Us
    • Why Us
    • Contact Us
    • News
Log In Sign Up
  • Home
  • Instant Online Quote
    • PCB Instant Quote
    • PCB Assembly Quote
    • SMD-Stencil Quote
  • PCB Assembly
  • PCB Capabilities
  • Feedback
  • Resources
    • Sponsorship
    • PCB Softwares
    • Units Conversion
    • FAQ
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Why Us
    • Contact Us
    • News
service@ALLPCB.com
Thank you very much for your valuable suggestion!
We will solve it as soon as possible!

MOSFET small-signal output resistance

2/11/2017 11:53:22 PM

The Effect of Channel-Length Modulation
In the two previous articles, we introduced the actively loaded MOSFET differential pair and discussed two prominent advantages of this configuration—namely, improved biasing (compared to the use of drain resistors) and differential-to-single-ended conversion without loss of gain.
Now it’s time to analyze the differential gain of this circuit; before we can determine the gain, though, we need to understand the concept of small-signal output resistance and how we incorporate this resistance into our analysis. (If you’re not sure what I mean by “small-signal,” take a look at the “Two Outputs or One?” section in this article.)
The first thing to understand is that small-signal output resistance is not an inherent, precise property of a real MOSFET. Rather, it is amodelthat we use to account for the effect of channel-length modulation on a MOSFET’s small-signal behavior. Recall that MOSFETs used for linear amplification are typically biased in the saturation region, which corresponds to when the FET’s channel is “pinched off” at the drain end.
This equation conveys the assumption that drain current is not affected by the drain-to-source voltage. The MOSFET acts like a dependent current source controlled by the overdrive voltage VOV, where VOV = VGS – VTH. This assumption is based on the idea that increasing the drain-to-source voltage does not alter the channel once it has become pinched off.
As you’ve probably noticed, though, the real world is not particularly conducive to idealized situations such as this.
The reality is that increasing the drain-to-source voltage does have a nontrivial effect on the channel: the pinch-off point is moved toward the source, and the result is more drain-to-source current as drain-to-source voltage increases. This means that we need an additional circuit element to account for this additional current, and by now you have probably guessed that the element we’re looking for is a resistor—namely, the small-signal output resistance ro.
So now we have a MOSFET, which is still assumed to be immune to increasing drain-to-source voltage, in conjunction with an ordinary resistor, which (like any resistor) has a current flow equal to the voltage across the resistor divided by the resistance. As drain-to-source voltage increases, more current flows through the resistor, and this current compensates for the lack of change in the drain current of the idealized MOSFET. By combining these two currents—drain current of the idealized FET and current through the resistor—we can find the total drain current for arealMOSFET.
Ignoring channel-length modulation is equivalent to assuming that the small-signal output resistance of the FET is infinite. It follows, then, that higher output resistance is desirable if we want a MOSFET to behave more like the idealized component in which drain current is not influenced by drain-to-source voltage. As we will see later, small-signal output resistance is determined in part by the FET’s DC bias current, so we do have some ability to increase the output resistance of a given device.
One last note before we move on: Output resistance is itself a simplification of real MOSFET behavior. The subatomic action taking place in a MOSFET’s channel is not exactly straightforward, and it comes as no surprise to me that the simple linear relationship represented by a drain-to-source resistor is not the whole story.
So the finite output resistance lowers the gain, because the equivalent resistance of two resistors in parallel is always less than that of either individual resistor. This demonstrates the desirability of higher small-signal output resistance: if ro is much larger than RD, the reduction in gain will be negligible. Notice also that the output resistance places an upper limit on AV; no matter how much drain resistance you have, the equivalent resistance RD||ro will never be higher than ro. This means that AV cannot exceed (gm × ro), which is referred to as a MOSFET’sintrinsic gain.
Lambda
OK, so how do we calculate the small-signal output resistance? You need two things: bias current and lamba (or λ, for those who are a little foggy on the Greek alphabet).
$$r_o=\frac{1}{\lambda\times I_D}$$
Lambda depends on physical characteristics of the FET and on the device’s bias conditions, but to make life tolerably simple we ignore the dependence on bias conditions and assume that lambda is a constant for a particular process technology.
You should be aware, though, that lambda increases as the length of the physical channel decreases. ID (fortunately more straightforward than lambda) is the FET’s DC-bias drain current—i.e., the drain current that you ignore when performing small-signal analysis.
I looked through some NMOS SPICE models and saw lambda values in the range of, say, 0.01 to 0.1 V–1. With a bias current of 500 µA, this range corresponds to small-signal output resistance of 200 kΩ to 20 kΩ.
This gives you an idea of the high gains we can achieve by loading an amplifier with a transistor’s small-signal output resistance instead of an ordinary drain resistor (if you find this statement confusing, refer back to “The Drain-Resistor Problem” and “Thinking About a Current Source” in this article). Keep in mind, though, that state-of-the-art short-channel MOSFETs will have higher lambda (and thus lower gain).
Conclusion
Now that we have explored small-signal output resistance, we are ready to analyze the differential gain of our actively loaded MOSFET differential pair. We’ll do this in the next article, and we’ll also empirically (i.e., via simulation) measure lambda so that we can predict the gain of an LTspice differential amplifier.
  • 1380
  • 1
  • 87
Post Comment

    Sebastian Charlak

    2/13/2017 11:53:22 PM

    Awesome post. Like it very much.

    You might like

    Andy

    • Threads

      15

    • Following

      0

    • Followers

      0

    PCB Prototype

    PCB Instant Quote

    x mm

    Quantity

    Quote Now

    PCB Assembly

    SMT-Stencil

    • 12
    Products & Service
    PCB Capabilities
    Aluminum PCB Service
    PCB Assembly Service
    SMT-Stencil
    Quotation & Feedback
    Online Auto-Quotation
    PCB Assembly Quote
    Quote by Salesperson
    Customer Reviews
    Customer Support
    FAQ
    Community
    Sponsorship
    Referral Program
    About Us
    About Us
    Why Us
    Contact Us
    News
    Resource Details
    PCB Software
    Units Conversion
    service@allpcb.com central_support@allpcb.com
    Follow Us:
    Facebook YouTube Twitter Tumblr YouTube
    Certification: Certification
    Our Preferred Partners: Our Preferred Partners

    Please send Gerbers to service@ALLPCB.com for quotation © Label_AllpcbcomallRightsReserved Privacy PolicySitemap

    Secure Site by GoDaddy.com This site has earned the McAfee SECURE certification.