To create robust and cost-effective printed circuit boards, layout designers need to follow best practices for PCB footprint generation. The quality of a PCB footprint directly impacts the performance, reliability and quality of the PCB assembly.

The first step in designing a perfect PCB footprint is contacting your chosen fabrication vendor and contract manufacturer, and understanding their specific DFM guidelines. Whether you’re designing a prototype PCB or a high-volume product, following DFM (Design for Manufacturing) guidelines will reduce the number of manufacturing defects you encounter, saving money by improving yield and eliminating debug time.

In addition to DFM Guidelines, there are a number of industry standards provided by IPC (the Association Connecting Electronics Industries). The IPC standard pertaining to SMT footprints is IPC-7351, Generic Requirements for Surface Mount Design and Land Pattern Standard.

There are various schematic capture and EDA tools that can be used for PCB layout, including Altium Designer, Cadence Allegro, and Mentor Graphics Expedition. Regardless of your choice in software, it’s best to take a close look at how the design rules are set up and make sure they’re in line with the DFM guidelines from your fab and assembly vendors.

An SMT footprint is IPC-7351 compliant if the calculated solder fillets meet the component-specific criteria in the standard. Each component has toe, heel, and side solder fillets, as illustrated below.

When creating a footprint, you should verify that the solder fillets meet the IPC criteria, and the footprint meets the DFM guidelines from your vendor. Let’s look at an example of a QFN package. QFNs (quad-flat no-leads), SONs, and all components in the no-lead family are an enticing package choice for layout designers because their small size, perimeter I/O pads, and large thermal/ground pad. This combination of factors makes them ideal for designs where the routing is tight or heat dissipation is important.

The downside is that QFNs are also notoriously difficult for PCB assembly, due to their fine pitch and flat bottom. In addition, the heatsinking provided by the thermal pad makes them difficult to rework.

Below we describe how the footprint is created, when we take both the IPC-7351 criteria and the capabilities of PCB Fabrication and PCB Assembly vendors into consideration.

The table below shows the land-pattern A, B and C with the DFMA rules, design rules and whether or not the solder fillet goals are met as per IPC-7351.

In case A, the footprint is perfect, as it meets both DFM guidelines and IPC-7351 criteria.

In case B, the DFM guidelines have significant impact on the land pattern geometry, and the side fillet does not comply with IPC-7351. This situation should be discussed with the fab and assembly vendors.

In case C, solder-mask gang was employed as the pad-to-pad spacing was too large, as per the supplied DFM guidelines, to let the land patterns meet the criteria. Therefore, the pad-to-pad spacing could be reduced to 8 mils from the 11 mils. For use of footprint C, the customer should make sure that the CM is able to handle solder mask gang on 0.5mm pitch package. (This may be a possible solution for Case B as well.)

Understanding the DFM guidelines and IPC-7351 criteria will allow you to reduce the number of defects in your PCB assemblies, saving you time and money.